You know what this phone needs? A keypad

crystalball.jpgThe Times of London has seen the future, and it may not include a touchscreen.

In the midst of an article on how Apple’s European partners overestimated the demand for first-generation iPhones and will likely take a bath on clearing out inventory for the rumored 3G iPhone that’s in the works, the Times’ Jonathan Richards reports on what form that future iPhone might take.

Industry sources told Times Online that the device will have a “radically different” appearance to the current device, which has a 4.5 inch screen and slick, aluminium backing. Among the possibilities are flip version, which would enable the screen to be larger, and a sliding model with a regular qwerty keyboard — as opposed to a touchscreen one.

In fact, the Times goes on to say, we may wind up with multiple iPhone models — one that looks like the current version for users who basically want an iPod with a phone attached, one with a keyboard for people who want a communication tool, and a third model with a larger screen for people who demand a laptop replacement. Which raises the question as to whether we’re even talking about an iPhone anymore or some new, still-theoretical mobile device from Cupertino.

The Dallas Morning News — from which I snagged the Times link — thinks this is a bad idea. Victor Godinez writes in the paper’s Technology Blog:

The reason the iPhone has become such an iconic device — at least to us naive hicks in the U.S. — is that it dumped all the clunky, conventional cell phone features.

Unfounded speculation or keen insight into the iPhone’s future? We’ll find out for certain later this year, I guess, when the 3G iPhone will reportedly debut.

Category: Musings

Comments (4)

I love my iPhone the way it is... I hate flip phones, and I hate physical keyboards, and I don't want an iPod with "o yeah, it does have a phone too." I want there to be equal emphasis on all features... so none of the things mentioned by the times, "iPod with Phone attached," "Physical Keyboard," Sliding or Flip Phone," none of the appeal to me at all. I hope they continue to offer the current form factor and concept...

 

Yeah, remember how Apple kept going larger with each new iPod line...

Victor Godinez nailed it.

 

Its just called The Times, not The Times of London. I realise you need to differentiate from NYT etc but the reason NYT is called as such is because there was already a 'The Times'. Also I do understand that aside from possible naivity its so U.S. readers know which paper youre talking about but really I think you should allow them to make the mistake themselves as this molly coddling shows no one any respect.

Small point? Maybe, but when the mistake is repeated often enough it can be quite irritating.

 

It would really surprise me if Jobs decides to put a physical keyboard on the iphone. The whole point to the virtual keyboard was that you got that real estate back...

I would also be surprised if Apple carried multiple different models of the same thing. Yes they do this to a point on the IPod but... We're talking about drastic production differences which ultimately leads to increases in manufacturing costs. I say that Apple stays with the formula they have going now.

Also, I can type faster on my iphone than I can on a mini keyboard.

 

Post a comment

ABOUT iPHONE CENTRAL

Get the latest news, reviews, and opinion about Apple's groundbreaking iPhone from the Apple experts at Macworld.

Want more information? Be sure to check out our complete iPhone coverage.

iPHONE VERSION

Our site's pretty iPhone friendly. But if you'd like to test an iPhone-app-like version of our site, click here and give it a go.

MACWORLD'S iPHONE REVIEW

How does the iPhone stack up? Read our in-depth review.

iPHONE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

Send your iPhone thoughts:
via e-mail
via voicemail
and we may use them on the site.


CATEGORIES

BLOG ARCHIVE