Review: Ultimate Buds UB7 and UB7EB

A common complaint about the iPhone is that it has no physical buttons for playback control; you’re forced to use the phone’s touchscreen, which presents challenges when carrying the iPhone in a bag or pocket. Another complaint is that the iPhone’s recessed headphone jack prevents you from using many third-party headphones that offer better performance than the stock earbuds.
Apple provides a workaround for the first issue via the special earbuds included with the iPhone: the right-hand cable provides a small, inline module that includes a microphone and a control module. Squeeze the module once to pause or resume iPod playback, or to answer or end a call; squeeze it twice in succession to skip to the next track. The functionality is limited—you can’t skip back, skim, or perform any other action, but it’s a welcome way to get at least some degree of playback and call control.
Third-party vendors have provided workarounds for the second issue through small adapters that let you connect other headphones to the iPhone’s headphone jack. (We’ve reviewed two, and we have a few more to cover.) Unfortunately, when you use most third-party headphones, you lose the stock earbuds’ control module and microphone. Shure makes an adapter that includes such functionality, but it’s $40 and somewhat bulky.
For those who want better audio quality without losing the additional features of Apple’s earbuds, an appealing alternative is provided by Ultimate Buds. The company takes a set of quality in-ear-canal headphones—either the Etymotics ER-6i (MSRP $149) or the Future Sonics/XtremeMac FS1 (MSRP $150)—and a set of Apple’s iPhone earbuds, and then performs electronics surgery, grafting the iPhone-headset’s cable and controller onto the in-ear-canal headphones. The result is the Ultimate Buds UB7 (pictured above) or UB7EB, each $150 (at the time of this writing, the UB7EB is on sale for $120). You get the sound quality and noise isolation of the ER-6i (UB7) or FS1 (UB7EB) with the playback-control and phone-making convenience of Apple’s own iPhone earbuds. (Ultimate Buds will instead modify your favorite set of headphones for $40; we didn’t test this service.)
Despite the "hackiness" of the concept, I was impressed by both models. The cables look like they were originally made for the headphones, and after straining the connections between the earpieces and cables by repeatedly pulling and yanking, both models continued to work well. In terms of microphone performance, other participants in phone conversations couldn't tell the difference between a stock set of iPhone earbuds and the Ultimate Buds. (This is to be expected, given that both use the same microphone and circuitry, but I tested it to be sure that the conversion didn't affect performance.)
As for sound quality, the iPhone-cable-equipped ER-6i or FS1 sound just as good as the unmodified models of each. We've published mini reviews of the originals, so I won't get into the topic too much here. Suffice it to say that both headphones are very good products for their ~$100 street prices. Those looking for a fairly neutral presentation, and don't mind a lack of prominent bass response, will likely prefer the ER-6i; those who want a warmer sound with strong bass should opt for the FS1 (hence the EB designation-- for extra bass--for the FS1-based Ultimate Buds model).
On the other hand, there are a few things to keep in mind about both Ultimate Buds products. First, because the company is disassembling the headphones, the original 1-year manufacturer warranties are void. In their place, Ultimate Buds provides its own 90-day warranty. Second, we noted in our primer on in-ear-canal headphones that most headphones of this type suffer, to some degree, from the occlusion effect, a phenomenon where your voice and other bodily noises—breathing, coughing, eating, etc.—seem louder or unnatural while wearing canalphones. This is indeed the case here--using in-ear-canal headphones as a phone headset is an odd experience. (Your voice sounds normal to people on the other end of your phone conversations, and their voices sound normal to you; it's only hearing your own voice that sounds strange.)
That said, most people will get used to this phenomenon after a while. And even if they don't, many people in the market for a set of stereo headphones with headset functionality will spend much more time listening to music than talking on the phone, and my guess is that the advantages of good canalphones over the iPhone's stock earbuds--in terms of both sound quality and noise isolation--and the ability to take a call without removing those headphones will be an acceptable tradeoff. If you're a fan of the ER-6i or FS1, Ultimate Buds' versions are attractive accessories for your iPhone.
Category: Accessories, Reviews
ABOUT iPHONE CENTRAL
Get the latest news, reviews, and opinion about Apple's groundbreaking iPhone from the Apple experts at Macworld.
Want more information? Be sure to check out our complete iPhone coverage.
iPHONE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
Send your iPhone thoughts:
via e-mail
via voicemail
and we may use them on the site.
BLOG ARCHIVE
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (39)
- April 2008 (34)
- March 2008 (33)
- February 2008 (50)
- January 2008 (34)
- December 2007 (33)
- November 2007 (42)
- October 2007 (45)
- September 2007 (53)
- August 2007 (67)
- July 2007 (111)
- June 2007 (82)
CATEGORIES
- Accessories (39)
- AT&T (47)
- Hacking (31)
- Hardware (26)
- Musings (102)
- News (217)
- Reader Experiences (5)
- Reviews (51)
- Software (139)
- Tips & Troubleshooting (79)
- Videos (9)
- Wi-Fi (15)

Comments (7)
I have a pair of these and frankly, taking phone calls on in ear canal buds is sorta weird and disconcerting. I stopped using mine and put them up for sale. YMMV.
What's still needed is some kind of wired remote for the iPod that allows you plug your phones and the remote in at the same time (think: a splitter jack). The remote can then be on it's own cord which you can clip to your headphone wires to keep the remote handy.
Posted by okeanos | November 21, 2007 10:52 AM
okeanos
You mean like this:
http://www.monstercable.com/productdisplay.asp?pin=4571
I have it and use it with some cheap earbuds and it works great. It also has little clips along the cable to connect to the headphone cord. And yes, talking on the phone with canal buds is kinda weird. It's $15-$20.
Posted by brian | November 21, 2007 1:56 PM
I purchased the custom ER-6i buds about a month ago. I sent in my stock iphone earbuds and received a customized set about a week later. I didn't get the same cable back so they must just send out a pre-made pair (my old buds had a permanent ink stain on the cord).
UB tells you to give the buds some time to mellow and develop more bass notes. But after a month of fairly steady use, my buds still pretty much sound like a tinny transistor radio. The earbuds cone with 2 types of earpieces: silicone and foam. I've tried both types and I'm sure I've achieved a complete seal (you essentially give yourself a wet-willie to seal the silicone ear pieces). Nothing I've tried has produced an acceptable level of bass. If you set EQ to bass boost and crank the volume at all, the phones distort terribly.
Using the phone with the earbuds is no weirder than using any headphone that covers both ears. Yes, the caller sounds like they are inside your head, but you can understand them very well, even in a noisy environment. When I drive, I leave out the left earbud so I can talk and drive handsfree and still hear what's going on around me. The microphone and answering/hanging-up functionality remain as Steve intended and works very well.
In all I'd give phone function 7/10 and music function 4/10.
Philip
Posted by PSTMD | November 23, 2007 11:06 PM
Philip, a few comments:
The ER-6i are known for being fairly accurate overall, but not having much bass impact. (Canalphones in general lack the visceral bass response of headphones with larger drivers, but the ER-6i especially so.) If you want more bass, I recommend contacting Ultimate Buds to see if they might let you swap the UB7 for the UB7EB.
> If you set EQ to bass boost and crank the volume at all,
> the phones distort terribly."
This is a known problem with the iPhone's/iPod's EQ; the Bass Boost setting can distort noticeably.
> Using the phone with the earbuds is no weirder than using
> any headphone that covers both ears. Yes, the caller sounds
> like they are inside your head, but you can understand them
> very well, even in a noisy environment.
The issue I was referring to the in review relates to how you sound to yourself, not how well you can hear other people. When it comes to how you sound to yourself, there's quite a bit of difference between standard "closed" headphones and in-ear-canal models. Standard closed headphones give you a different sensation than open headphones, but they don't suffer from the occlusion effect, which is a specific phenomenon that occurs when canalphones seal tightly against your ear canal.
Posted by Dan Frakes | November 24, 2007 1:14 AM
I took a razor blade to an old pair of $9.99 headphones just where the bulge of plastic prevents it from fitting into the recessed jack. Scoring a line all the way around, I then just pulled off the extra plastic. It was really easy, and took all of 30 seconds. Apparently that extra plastic is only cosmetic. If you do a nice even cut, it looks like that's how it came from the factory. I dunno if it works on all headphones, but it was a simple cheap way to make my own headphones work.
Posted by Brian G | November 24, 2007 10:52 PM
Phillip,
We would be happy to exchange your buds for the UB7EB if you'd like to try those - please just give us a call or email.
The Etymotics should NOT sound like a transistor radio. These are $150 earbuds that use some of the best and highly researched in-ear speakers available! The only way they will not sound full is if they aren't inserted properly or if your ear anatomy just doesn't allow them to seal up. We find that about 3-5% of people just can't get a good seal, and we gladly offer those people a refund or let them exchange.
Happy Listening,
Brad, Ultimate Buds
Posted by Ultimate Buds | November 26, 2007 1:24 PM
Thanks Brad,
That is a very generous offer. I will email you. The problem may be anatomical. The reason I bought Canal phones is because I can't find a set of ear buds that work in my ears. I had the same problem with my stethoscope.
Dan, Re: When it comes to how you sound to yourself, there's quite a bit of difference between standard "closed" headphones and in-ear-canal models.
I understood what you meant. Hearing myself is a nonissue for me. Of course you only hear the resonant tones that are transmitted directly through your body from the vocal cords to the eardrum. As I tried to indicate, if that bothers you, you can just pull out the left earbud. Personally, I find that the ambient noise screening I get during a conversation allows me to hear myself and the caller better that any standard phone earpiece ever could. I understand however that this sensation might be disconcerting to those unused to having their ears covered while they talk (In my case, by a stethoscope.)
Philip
Posted by PSTMD | November 26, 2007 2:35 PM