Jack not name, jack job
So I was talking to Apple marketing VP Greg Joswiak today. (Boy, doesn’t that sound chummy?) Anyway, Joz — we call him Joz, those of us who can’t ever remember his first name — was telling me all about this iPhone battery nonsense.
When we were done with that, I didn’t forget about you guys, who wanted me to ask about the damned recessed headphone jack that makes many headphones not plug into the iPhone without an adapter.
“The jack is recessed in order to maintain the integrity of that design,” Joswiak told me. I asked him what that meant — if he meant that it needed to be that way to keep the structural integrity of the headphone jack intact, or if he meant the integrity of the pretty industrial design of the phone.
The latter, he told me. That if they had wanted the jack to not be recessed, the phone would have had to be thicker at that point, and they weren’t willing to compromise the shape — specifically the thinness — of the design.
When I made complaining noises about the fact that this means all our headphones are useless without adapters, he pointed out that iPod headphones — “the most popular headphones in the world” — are compatible with the iPhone. I would argue that it’s the iPod that those headphones came with that’s popular. Most people I know think the iPod headphones themselves aren’t very good, although I have to admit the iPhone’s headphones are quite nice. (Update: The previous generation of iPod headphones? Not compatible.)
Still, Joz pointed out that since the iPhone is a phone, you’d want an adapter (like Shure’s forthcoming Music Phone Adapter) to add a microphone to your beloved set of headphones. And he also suggested that many headphone manufacturers, aware of the popularity of Apple’s music-playing products, have been in touch with Apple to discuss creating future headphone cords with designs that fit the iPhone’s jack.
I’m really looking forward to giving the Shure adapter a test drive. In the meantime, I’m using Belkin’s headphone adapter and my Etymotic headphones most of the time, switching to Apple’s headphones occasionally when I suspect I’ll need to take a call during my journey.
Category: News
ABOUT iPHONE CENTRAL
Get the latest news, reviews, and opinion about Apple's groundbreaking iPhone from the Apple experts at Macworld.
Want more information? Be sure to check out our complete iPhone coverage.
iPHONE VERSION
Our site's pretty iPhone friendly. But if you'd like to test an iPhone-app-like version of our site, click here and give it a go.
MACWORLD'S iPHONE REVIEW
How does the iPhone stack up? Read our in-depth review.
iPHONE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
Send your iPhone thoughts:
via e-mail
via voicemail
and we may use them on the site.
RECENT COMMENTS 
- Dave-O on Free episodes of Office, 30 Rock for iPhone users
- Michael Appel on Vodafone can count to ten
- robin on Flaky IMAP may suck iPhone's battery life
- Rafael Borges on iPhone bound for Latin America
- Dave on iPhone SDK beta five is alive
- Julian on Flaky IMAP may suck iPhone's battery life
- Dave T on All the news that's fit to read on your iPhone
- Ray on Flaky IMAP may suck iPhone's battery life
- DistortedLoop on All the news that's fit to read on your iPhone
- Jean Alexis on Rematch of the, er, month: iPhone vs. BlackBerry, round two
CATEGORIES
- Accessories (39)
- AT&T (40)
- Hacking (31)
- Hardware (25)
- Musings (100)
- News (198)
- Reader Experiences (4)
- Reviews (51)
- Software (136)
- Tips & Troubleshooting (77)
- Videos (9)
- Wi-Fi (15)
BLOG ARCHIVE
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (34)
- March 2008 (33)
- February 2008 (50)
- January 2008 (34)
- December 2007 (33)
- November 2007 (42)
- October 2007 (45)
- September 2007 (53)
- August 2007 (67)
- July 2007 (111)
- June 2007 (82)

Comments (17)
So, form over function.
Got it.
As for the "world's most popular" headphones, he might have been more accurate describing them as the "world's most common" headphones, and I mean that in the most common way possible.
Posted by Chris Breen
|
July 12, 2007 8:54 PM
I suspect that "common" is really what he meant, but he does have the word Marketing in his job title, so that's what you get.
Posted by Jason Snell
|
July 12, 2007 9:14 PM
The 30GB 5G iPod is thinner than the iPhone, has it's head phone jack all the way to the edge of the case, AND maintains the "shape" or "design integrity." It does this by simply profiling what would be the exposed lip of the jack to match the curved profile of the case.
I guess they forgot what they did two years ago.
Posted by jsk | July 12, 2007 9:38 PM
The two devices are shaped a little different -- the iPhone's top edge is entirely curved, sweeping up from the screen side and then back down to the camera side. The 5G 30GB iPod basically starts from a flat edge and then falls away.
But you're right, they managed to do it with the 5G iPod. I suspect there's some reinforcement going on here, and probably some internal design issues (i.e., location of components) that were also limiting. But that's not what I was told by Apple, FWIW.
Posted by Jason Snell
|
July 12, 2007 9:56 PM
I'm not sure what he meant about ipod headphones being compatible. I have two pairs, one from a 2nd gen, and one of the very newest redesign, and neither works to play music on my iphone!
Posted by bdj21ya | July 13, 2007 12:28 AM
Is it just me or is it not true that all iPod headphones fit, as Joz supposedly said according to this article? I have a set from the 4G iPod that don't fit.
Posted by Eric | July 13, 2007 1:22 AM
It's definitely an issue with the curve. The headphone jack would have flared out beyond the sides of the narrowest point of the curve, I think. I've certainly seen devices with that sort of physical feature before.
That doesn't mean it's so important as to make everyone's life difficult. I find that ugly Belkin adapter much more offensive than a sub-millimeter bulge in the iPhone's case.
Are those Ultimate Ears in the picture up top? If so...
Has anybody tried the "razorblade mod" and cut off the plastic ring where it meets the metal of the plug?
Also, seems like UE and their removable cables would enable an easy swapout for a cable with the Apple-style plug, mic, and clicker.
Posted by Ward
|
July 13, 2007 2:27 AM
I understand where Joz is coming from, but then considering Belkin's adapter sells for $10, why wouldn't Apple consider including an adapter themselves? (It probably would have cost them $0.99 to make one that was not as ugly as Belkin's)
It would have been a nice good will move.
That being said... Yes, I did try the "razorblade" mod. I took a $6 radioshack headphone splitter - one male to 2 females. I cut off one of the females and shaved down the plastic to fit the iPhone jack. And it worked like a charm.
Posted by Clearlighter | July 13, 2007 10:08 AM
Eric: It's not just you. Any Apple headphones prior to the new headphones -- the new ones shaped like a bubble pipe with the longer plastic extension on each earbud -- don't work with the iPhone.
Posted by Chris Breen
|
July 13, 2007 12:29 PM
Mystifying.
Posted by Jason Snell
|
July 13, 2007 2:19 PM
@Ward: Yes, those are UE's. I haven't tried the razorblade mod yet, but I may at some point. I've got a spare set of cables.
I do hope that UE makes a headphone/mic/clicker combo cable someday.
-jason
Posted by Jason Snell
|
July 13, 2007 2:20 PM
Why is it that I think nobody got my reference?
Posted by Jason Snell
|
July 13, 2007 5:48 PM
As someone else stated, it's the curved shape along the edges of the aluminum back that requires the jack to appear recessed on the dorsal/front side. Note that at the ventral/back side of the phone, the jack is nearly flush with the hole. There was really no other way for Apple to provide a jack along the side without altering the exterior shape of the phone.
Apple really should smooth off the edges of the hole in the aluminum, though. Those edges are not just annoying to the touch, they're sharp. I've already seen one report on the 'net of a person who gouged their fingertip when inserting their hand in a pocket containing the iPhone.
Posted by Foo | July 14, 2007 1:51 PM
I just checked: My Etymotics (ER 6i) work fine with my iPhone.
Posted by Joseph Marra | July 15, 2007 12:52 PM
For anyone that was curious about Ultimate Ears, I succeeded in modding mine without much trouble.
The circular plastic part at the base of the jack needs to come off. The entire thing. There's another thing layer of plastic below that; try to leave it intact.
Headphones fit almost perfectly. The plug is free to rotate 360 degrees. I had a spare set of wires so I had no worries about sacrificing them, but they worked well anyway.
I also contacted UE and they said they would eventually sell an iPhone compatible set of replacement wires. Here's hoping they have a mic and a clicker too.
Posted by Ward
|
July 20, 2007 2:52 PM
I don't know why you guys don't see through this. Behind the company line, it's a way to get more money for a proprietary accessory. By making the iPhone jack unique, Apple has created demand and necessity for new iPhone specific-headphones.
Posted by Hass Lunsford | September 10, 2007 11:55 AM
You don't need to switch to Apple's headphones if you think you might get a call. The iPhone "knows" if your headphones have a microphone. If not, you can lift the bottom of the phone to your mouth to speak into the built in mic, but still hear the other end of the call through your headphones.
This was a delightful surprise to me, as I much prefer my Tri-ports to the included earbuds.
Posted by Brentano | September 17, 2007 9:25 AM